Overview
Use referential and substitution devices to create seamless, sophisticated written and spoken discourse.
Reference Types
- AnaphoricPoints back: The committee submitted its report. It was accepted.
- CataphoricPoints forward: This is the central claim: the policy has failed.
- DemonstrativeThis / these / that / those — distance and recency
- ComparativeSimilar problems arose in 2019. (implicit reference)
Substitution Patterns
- NominalWould you prefer the shorter report or the longer one?
- VerbalShe resigned, and several colleagues did so shortly after.
- ClausalIs the data reliable? I believe so / I believe not.
- The former/latterFormal precision: avoids repetition, directs reader's attention
Common C2 Mistakes
- ❌ Ambiguous 'this': The data showed a trend. This was unexpected. → ✅ This trend was unexpected.
- ❌ Do so with stative verbs → ✅ She knows it; he does too. (not 'does so')
- ❌ The later vs the latter → ✅ the latter = the second of two
- ❌ Cataphoric 'it' without clear forward reference structure
When to use
Academic prose
Two models were proposed. The former emphasises agency; the latter, structure.
Formal reports
This finding is significant: it challenges the prevailing consensus.
Legal writing
The following conditions apply. Those who fail to comply face penalties.
Quality writing
Several policies were introduced. None did so with lasting effect.